Introduction
Osteoarthritis is a common joint disease affecting many people worldwide. Improving treatment options is essential for enhancing patients’ quality of life.
Study Overview
This study compared two types of total knee arthroplasty (TKA): personalized (custTKA) and standard (convTKA). The goal was to see how each method impacted patients’ walking, posture, and overall health after surgery.
Participants
A total of 73 patients took part in the study. They were mostly aged around 66 and had various body weights. Surgeries were performed by two experienced surgeons.
Methods of Evaluation
The success of the surgeries was measured using:
- Forgotten Knee Joint Score (FKJS)
- Knee Society Score (KSS)
- Gait evaluation using special sensors
- Postural stability checks
- X-ray analysis of knee alignment
Key Findings
Overall, there were no significant differences in walking ability or patient satisfaction between the two types of surgery. Measurements of gait, such as walking speed and stride length, showed improvement over time but were similar for both surgery types.
Conclusion
In this study, custTKA did not show any notable advantages over convTKA in terms of clinical outcomes or patient satisfaction.
Practical Healthcare Solutions
Based on these findings, clinics and patients can:
- Focus on standard total knee arthroplasty as a viable treatment option for osteoarthritis.
- Set measurable goals for postoperative recovery without the need for personalized implants.
- Utilize AI tools tailored to enhance patient monitoring and outcomes.
- Start with pilot projects to track the effectiveness of treatments and adjust care plans as needed.
Contact Information for AI Solutions
For assistance with AI solutions in medical management, reach out to us:
- Telegram: https://t.me/itinai
- X: https://x.com/vlruso
- LinkedIn: https://www.linkedin.com/company/itinai/
