Effect of Utilizing Different Data Sources on Clinical Trial Findings
Key Findings:
A study investigated the impact of using self-reported questionnaires, administrative data, or a combination of both on the outcomes of a long-term clinical trial.
Results showed that utilizing different data sources had no significant impact on the study findings compared to when outcomes were assessed using adjudicated outcomes.
There were no differences in study outcomes between participants exposed to betamethasone and those exposed to placebo when the outcomes were assessed using different data sources.
The study concluded that utilizing self-reported questionnaires, administrative data, or a combination of both for assessing study outcomes had no impact on the study findings compared with when outcomes were assessed using adjudicated outcomes.
Practical Solutions and Value:
Clinical trials are essential for developing safe and effective treatments. Utilizing a combination of self-reported questionnaires and administrative data can enhance ascertainment of outcomes in follow-up studies.
Streamlining operations in healthcare is crucial, and AI-driven platforms like DocSym can consolidate standards, protocols, and research for easier access by clinicians.
Mobile apps can support scheduling, monitoring treatments, and telemedicine, making it easier to manage patient care and expand services digitally in today’s healthcare environment.
Using AI in clinics can enhance workflows, improve patient outcomes, and reduce paper routines. Learn more about how AIdevMD can help at aidevmd.com.
