Study Overview
This study examined how effective low-load resistance training with blood flow restriction (LRT-BFR) is compared to conventional high-intensity resistance training (CRT) for older adults with sarcopenia.
Key Findings
- Participants: 21 older adults (65 years and older) diagnosed with sarcopenia.
- Training Groups:
- LRT-BFR: 20%-30% of one-repetition maximum (1RM)
- CRT: 60%-70% of 1RM
- Duration: 12 weeks, with sessions three times a week.
Outcomes Measured
- Knee extensor strength (KES)
- Body composition (mass, BMI, body fat percentage)
- Muscle mass (appendicular skeletal muscle mass index)
- Handgrip strength
- Physical performance (short physical performance battery and 6-meter walk)
- Cardiovascular disease (CVD) risk factors (blood pressure, heart rate, cholesterol levels)
- Sarcopenia-related biomarkers (inflammatory markers, hormones)
- Quality of life (SF-36 Health Survey)
Results
Both training methods improved:
- Body composition
- Knee extensor strength
- Physical performance
- CVD risk factors
- Quality of life scores
However, CRT was more effective for increasing muscle mass, while LRT-BFR showed better results for cardiovascular health.
Conclusion
Both LRT-BFR and CRT are beneficial for older adults with sarcopenia. LRT-BFR can be a great alternative to CRT, especially for those looking to improve cardiovascular health.
Clinical Relevance
Clinical trials are essential for creating safe and effective treatments. Our AI-driven platform, DocSym, helps integrate clinical protocols and research into a single resource for healthcare providers.
Practical Solutions
- Streamlined Operations: Our mobile apps facilitate scheduling, treatment monitoring, and telemedicine.
- Enhanced Workflows: Utilizing AI can improve patient outcomes and reduce paper usage in clinics.
Discover more about our solutions at aidevmd.com.
