Itinai.com light and shadow chase in a bright biomedical labo ad12232e 48e7 4335 b615 18ed42101be9 2
Itinai.com light and shadow chase in a bright biomedical labo ad12232e 48e7 4335 b615 18ed42101be9 2

Clinical and cost-effectiveness of lithium versus quetiapine augmentation for treatment-resistant depression in adults: LQD a pragmatic randomised controlled trial

Clinical Trial Summary: Lithium vs. Quetiapine for Treatment-Resistant Depression

Background

Treatment-resistant depression (TRD) can be challenging for patients and healthcare providers. Lithium and quetiapine are common medications used to enhance the effects of antidepressants. However, there has been limited research directly comparing these options, especially over longer periods.

Trial Objectives

This trial aimed to determine if lithium or quetiapine is more effective and cost-efficient for patients with treatment-resistant depression over a 12-month period.

Study Design

The trial was conducted in multiple centers across England. Participants were randomly assigned to receive either lithium or quetiapine, following a standard safety assessment before treatment.

Participants

Adults aged 18 and over with major depressive disorder who had not responded adequately to at least two antidepressant treatments were included. Those with a history of psychosis or bipolar disorder were excluded.

Interventions

After randomization, clinicians prescribed the assigned medication while monitoring participants’ progress weekly with self-report questionnaires and follow-up visits at 8, 26, and 52 weeks.

Main Outcomes

The primary outcomes measured were:

  • Severity of depressive symptoms over 52 weeks.
  • Duration until treatment discontinuation for any reason.

Results

A total of 212 participants were included: 107 received quetiapine and 105 received lithium. Results indicated that:

  • Quetiapine led to a greater reduction in depressive symptoms compared to lithium.
  • The average time to stop treatment was similar for both medications.
  • Quetiapine proved to be more cost-effective than lithium.

Limitations

The trial was open-label, which could influence participants’ perceptions of the treatments. Additionally, some data were missing for secondary outcomes.

Conclusions

Quetiapine may be a more effective and affordable option than lithium for treating adults with treatment-resistant depression.

Future Directions

Further research on what factors influence treatment response can help tailor treatment options for individuals with treatment-resistant depression.

Measurable Outcomes for Clinics and Patients

Clinics should aim to:

  • Assess the effectiveness of quetiapine and lithium in their patient populations.
  • Monitor cost-effectiveness and patient outcomes.

AI Tools for Clinical Needs

AI solutions can assist in:

  • Tracking patient responses to treatments.
  • Performing economic analyses.

Next Steps

Start with small pilot projects utilizing AI in treatment monitoring, then expand based on results and real-world impacts.

Contact Us

For AI solutions in medical management, reach out via:

AI-Powered Health Tools

Interactive AI Tools to Help You Understand Your Health

Solutions for Smart Healthcare

Clinical Research