Acceptability and Effectiveness of a Study Information Video for Youth Consent
Overview
This study explores how using a video for research consent compares to traditional paper methods for young people aged 18-24 in Zimbabwe. The aim was to see if the video method was just as effective in helping participants understand the study.
Study Details
The trial took place from October 2021 to June 2022, alongside a larger survey. Participants were randomly assigned to either the video or paper-based consent method. We measured how well they understood the study using a questionnaire.
Key Findings
- A total of 921 participants joined the study, with an average age of 20 years.
- Both methods scored similarly in understanding, with an average score of 25.4 out of 30.
- The video method was found to be just as effective as the paper method in helping participants understand the information.
- Participants liked both methods, but many felt overwhelmed by the amount of information provided.
Conclusion
Using a video for consent is as effective as traditional paper methods. This approach is engaging and can improve the consent process for young people. Ethics committees should consider promoting the use of videos in research consent.
Enhancing Clinical Trials with Technology
Clinical trials are essential for developing safe treatments. Our AI-driven platform, DocSym, combines clinical standards and research into a single resource for healthcare professionals.
Practical Solutions
- Our mobile apps help with scheduling, treatment monitoring, and telemedicine, streamlining patient care.
- Using AI can improve clinic workflows and patient outcomes while reducing paperwork.
Discover how we can assist you at aidevmd.com.
